Volume 3, Issue 2 (2022)
san 2022, 3(2): 298-329 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Baharvand V, Amouri N, Khalili P. Analysis of the critical discourse in the novel "Nadi-el Sayarat" by Alaa Al-Aswany based on Norman Fairclough's theory. san 2022; 3 (2) :298-329
URL: http://san.khu.ac.ir/article-1-230-en.html
URL: http://san.khu.ac.ir/article-1-230-en.html
Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz , v.baharvand@scu.ac.ir
Abstract: (1085 Views)
Discourse explains the connection between language and society because discourse is the use of language to influence the audience. Critical discourse analysis originated from sociology and is one of the modern critical approaches influenced by the philosophical views of Michel Foucault, Marx and Freud and believes that there is a dialectical relationship between language and society. One of the pioneers of this approach is Norman Fairclough, whose theory rests on three levels: description, explanation, and explanation. Alaa Al Aswany's Automobile Club is one of the most famous contemporary Arab novels that explains the ideology of power and the social and political conditions in a modernist style in Egyptian society. In this article, we try to analyze the critical discourse of this novel based on the three levels of Norman Fairclough's theory adhering to the descriptive-analytical method. The results show that vocabulary and structures such as choosing the imperative form and using plural pronouns instead of singular pronouns describe solidarity, totalitarian ideology, antagonism and contrast, and clarify the contrast between the character of the kou who oppresses Egyptians and obeys foreigners. The repetition describes the discourse of protest and resistance against colonialism, the most important place being the "Car Club" where important events by foreigners and British take place. At the level of interpretation, historical intertextuality refers to previous texts such as Quranic verses, narratives, and historical events such as the Holocaust, the Haganah, Hitler's dictatorship and his crimes against humanity. At the level of clarity, the author explains the ideology of Egyptian colonialism and the power in the two forms of British power over Egypt in a strong way, and also the power of Englishman James over Egyptian slaves weakly in the novel. Al-Aswany reflects the revolution of the oppressed against the oppressor, and his most important goals are the destruction of the British occupation and the independence of Egypt, and in this way the author reflects the dignity and humanity that were destroyed under the clutches of the colonists.
References
1. الأسواني، علاء (2013)، نادي السیارات، القاهرة: دار الشروق.
2. آراسته‌خو، محمد (1991)، فرهنگ اصطلاحات علمی - اجتماعی، طهران: كستره.
3. آقاگل‌زاده، فردوس (1385)، تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
4. آقاگل‌زاده، فردوس (1392)، فرهنگ توصیفی تحلیل گفتمان و کاربرد شناسی، طهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
5. بحراوي، حسن (1990)، بنیة الشکل الروائي، بیروت: المرکز الثقافی العربي.
6. حلمي، خليل (1998)، دراسات في اللغة والمعاجم، بيروت: دار النهضة.
7. الراغب الأصفهاني، ابوالقاسم حسين بن محمد (۱٤۰۷)، مفردات في غريب القرآن، تحقیق و ضبط؛ محمد سید کیلاني، بيروت: دار المعرفة.
8. الزليطني، محمد لطفي (2014)، «من تحليل الخطاب إلى التحليل النقدي للخطاب»، مجلة الخطاب، 17ع، صص 9-36.
9. شافعیان، سبحان وکتایون فلاحي ولیلا قاسمي حاجي‌آبادي (1441)، «تحلیل النصوص الظرفیة والنصیة لروایة لاز طاهر وطار»، مجلة الکلیة الإسلامیة الجامعة، الجزء1، العدد53، صص542-557.
10. عكاشة، محمود (2005)، لغة الخطاب السياسي: دراسة لغویة تطبيقية في ضوء نظریة الاتصال، القاهرة: دار النشر للجامعات.
11. فیرکلاف، نورمان (2000)، درآمدی بر گفتمان انتقادی، ترجمة شعبانعلي بهرام‌پور، طهران: فرهنگ گفتمان.
12. فیرکلاف، نورمان (1379) تحلیل انتقادی گفتمان، مترجمان: فاطمه شایسته پیران و دیگران، ویراستاران: محمد نبوی و مهران مهاجر، تهران: مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات رسانه ها.
13. فيركلاف، نورمان (2016أ)، اللغة والسلطة، ترجمة: محمد عناني، القاهرة: المركز القومي للترجمة.
14. فيركلاف، نورمان (2016ب)، تحلیل الخطاب السیاسي، ترجمة: عبدالفتاح عمورة، دمشق: دار الفرقد.
15. قهرماني، علي وفاضل بيدار (1399)، «تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی خطبه‌های علی (ع) در جریان بیعت عمومی»، پژوهشنامه علوی، مج 11، عدد 21، صص 1-25.
16. مرتاض، عبدالملك (1991)، في تقنیات السرد، الکویت: عالم المعرفة.
17. نوروز، مهدي و فرنكيس فرهود (1395)، «تعلیم تحذیری سعدی در بوستان با رویکرد تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی نظریه فرکلاف»، پژوهشنامه ادبیات تعلیمی، مج 8، عدد 32، صص 161- 190.
18. یارمحمودي، لطف‌الله (1383)، گفتمان‌شناسی رایج و انتقادی، تهران: هرمس.
19. یورکنسن، ماریان و فیلیبس، لوئیز (1392)، نظریه و روش در تحلیل گفتمان، ترجمه هادي جلیلي، ط 3، طهران: ني.
20. Aghagolzadeh, Ferdous (1385), Critical Discourse Analysis, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural.
21. Aghagolzadeh, Ferdous (2012), Descriptive Culture of Discourse Analysis and Applied Studies, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural.
22. Akasha, Mahmoud (2005), The Language of Political Discourse: An Applied Linguistic Study in the Light of Communication Theory, Cairo: Universities Publishing House.
23. Al-Aswany, Alaa (2013), Nadi-el Sayarat, Cairo: Dar Al-Shorouk.
24. Al-Raghib Al-Isfahani, Abu Al-Qasim Hussein bin Muhammad (1407), Vocabulary in the strange Qur’an, investigation and control; Muhammad Sayed Kilani, Beirut: House of Knowledge.
25. Al-Zulaitni, Muhammad Lutfi (2014), “From discourse analysis to critical discourse analysis,” Al-Khattab Journal, 17p, pp. 9-36.
26. Arastekho, Mohammad (1991), Dictionary of Scientific-Social Terms, Tehran: Gostrah.
27. Bahrawi, Hassan (1990), The Structure of the Narrative Form, Beirut: The Arab Cultural Center.
28. Fairclough, Norman (1379) Critical Analysis of Discourse, translators: Fatemeh Shaista Piran and others, editors: Mohammad Nabovi and Mehran Mohajer, Tehran: Center for Media Studies and Research.
29. Fairclough, Norman (2000), An Introduction to Critical Discourse, translated by Shaban Ali Bahrampour, Tehran: Farhang Gofteman.
30. Fairclough, Norman (2016a), Language and Power, translated by: Mohamed Anani, Cairo: The National Center for Translation.
31. Fairclough, Norman (2016b), Political Discourse Analysis, translated by: Abdel Fattah Amora, Damascus: Dar Al-Farqad.
32. Helmy, Khalil (1998), Studies in Language and Dictionaries, Beirut: Dar Al-Nahda.
33. Jorgensen, Marian and Phillips, Louise (2012), Theory and Method in Discourse Analysis, translated by Hadi Jalili, 3rd edition, Tehran: Nai.
34. Murtad, Abdul-Malik (1991), In Narrative Techniques, Kuwait: The World of Knowledge.
35. Nowruz, Mahdi and Frangis Farhoud (1395), “Teaching exhortation Saadi Dar Bostan Pa Roykard Gaftman critical analysis of Farclaf’s theory”, Journal of Educational Literature, Vol. 8, No. 32, pp. 161-190.
36. Qahramani, Ali and Fadel Bidar (1399), “A critical analysis of Ghaftman’s sermons by Ali (peace be upon him) in the direction of the flow of public sales,” Alawi Research Journal, Vol. 11, No. 21, pp. 1-25.
37. Shafi’ian, Subhan Wakatayun Falahi and Laila Qasemi Hajiabadi (1441), “Analysis of the circumstantial and textual texts of Laz Taher Watar’s novel,” Journal of the Islamic College Jamia, Vol. 1, No. 53, pp. 542-557.
38. Yarmahmoudi, Lotfollah (2013), popular and critical discourse analysis, Tehran: Hermes.
39. Aghagolzadeh, Ferdous (1385), Critical Discourse Analysis, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural.
40. Aghagolzadeh, Ferdous (2012), Descriptive Culture of Discourse Analysis and Applied Studies, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural.
41. Akasha, Mahmoud (2005), The Language of Political Discourse: An Applied Linguistic Study in the Light of Communication Theory, Cairo: Universities Publishing House.
42. Al-Aswany, Alaa (2013), Nadi-el Sayarat, Cairo: Dar Al-Shorouk.
43. Al-Raghib Al-Isfahani, Abu Al-Qasim Hussein bin Muhammad (1407), Vocabulary in the strange Qur’an, investigation and control; Muhammad Sayed Kilani, Beirut: House of Knowledge.
44. Al-Zulaitni, Muhammad Lutfi (2014), “From discourse analysis to critical discourse analysis,” Al-Khattab Journal, 17p, pp. 9-36.
45. Arastekho, Mohammad (1991), Dictionary of Scientific-Social Terms, Tehran: Gostrah.
46. Bahrawi, Hassan (1990), The Structure of the Narrative Form, Beirut: The Arab Cultural Center.
47. Fairclough, Norman (1379) Critical Analysis of Discourse, translators: Fatemeh Shaista Piran and others, editors: Mohammad Nabovi and Mehran Mohajer, Tehran: Center for Media Studies and Research.
48. Fairclough, Norman (2000), An Introduction to Critical Discourse, translated by Shaban Ali Bahrampour, Tehran: Farhang Gofteman.
49. Fairclough, Norman (2016a), Language and Power, translated by: Mohamed Anani, Cairo: The National Center for Translation.
50. Fairclough, Norman (2016b), Political Discourse Analysis, translated by: Abdel Fattah Amora, Damascus: Dar Al-Farqad.
51. Helmy, Khalil (1998), Studies in Language and Dictionaries, Beirut: Dar Al-Nahda.
52. Jorgensen, Marian and Phillips, Louise (2012), Theory and Method in Discourse Analysis, translated by Hadi Jalili, 3rd edition, Tehran: Nai.
53. Murtad, Abdul-Malik (1991), In Narrative Techniques, Kuwait: The World of Knowledge.
54. Nowruz, Mahdi and Frangis Farhoud (1395), “Teaching exhortation Saadi Dar Bostan Pa Roykard Gaftman critical analysis of Farclaf’s theory”, Journal of Educational Literature, Vol. 8, No. 32, pp. 161-190.
55. Qahramani, Ali and Fadel Bidar (1399), “A critical analysis of Ghaftman’s sermons by Ali (peace be upon him) in the direction of the flow of public sales,” Alawi Research Journal, Vol. 11, No. 21, pp. 1-25.
56. Shafi’ian, Subhan Wakatayun Falahi and Laila Qasemi Hajiabadi (1441), “Analysis of the circumstantial and textual texts of Laz Taher Watar’s novel,” Journal of the Islamic College Jamia, Vol. 1, No. 53, pp. 542-557.
57. Yarmahmoudi, Lotfollah (2013), popular and critical discourse analysis, Tehran: Hermes.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
