Volume 3, Issue 1 (2022)
san 2022, 3(1): 255-284 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Kazemi E, Amiri J, Maroof Y, Rahmati Torkashvand M. Analysis of critical discourse in the novel "Ahdab Baghdad" based on "Farklaf" theory. san 2022; 3 (1) :255-284
URL: http://san.khu.ac.ir/article-1-211-en.html
URL: http://san.khu.ac.ir/article-1-211-en.html
Razi University , Gaamiri686@gmail.com
Abstract: (1799 Views)
Critical discourse analysis is one of the new language tools used to investigate the hidden relationship between language and ideology in society. And it shows the moral and ideological values hidden in the critical discourse. The present article aims to analyze the novel "Ahdab Baghdad" by the contemporary Iraqi novelist Riyad al-Qazi, relying on the descriptive-analytical method and based on Farklough's theory of critical discourse analysis, which is based on the proposition that: "Critical discourse as a tool for analysis social and cultural changes in three levels of description, interpretation and expression". Riyad al-Qadi has been able to provide the reader with a clear and transparent image of the Iraqi society by using narrative tools. One of the most important achievements and results of this research, which was conducted with a descriptive analytical method, is that in the Iraqi society, the discourse of power represented by the American occupiers and Iraqi autocrats has imposed its voice and ideology on the discourse of the society. And this has led to the spread of political, social and moral corruption, and the prevalence of embezzlement, theft, kidnapping, assassination, murder, smuggling, discrimination, cruelty, betrayal, family disintegration, etc.
Keywords: Arabic Narratology, critical discourse, dominance discourse, Ahdab Baghdad, Riyad al-Qadi, Norman Ferclough
References
1. آذرنوش، آذرتاش، (١٣٩١)، فرهنگ معاصر عربی - فارسی – انگلیسی، (ط. ١٧)، طهران: منشورات ني.
2. آقا گل زاده، فردوس، (۱۳۸۵)،« تحليل گفتمان انتقادی و ادبیات»، مجلة ادب پژوهى، (العدد الأول)، صص١٧-٢٧.
3. باغينى پور، مجید، (۱۳۸۰)، «تحليلي كوتاه بر بازتاب قدرت در زبان سخن کاوی انتقادی»، مجلة زبان شناسى،(ج. ١٦، العدد الأول) صص٢٠-٢١.
4. بيجارى؛ أعظم فرح، والآخرون، (۱۳۹۲)، «مقایسه خود پنداره وسازگاری در افراد خودشیفته سازگار وناسازگار»، مجلة مطالعات روانشناختي،(ط. 9- العدد الرابع)، صص٩٩-١٢٧، دانشگاه الزهراء س: دانشكده علوم تربيتى و روان شناسی.
5. حسينة، مسكين،(٢٠١٣)، شعرية العنوان في الشعر الجزائري المعاصر، رسالة الدكتوراه، الجزائر: جامعة وهران.
6. قاسمي گوراجویی؛ سجاد و امید اردلان، (۱۳۹۷)، تحليل گفتمان انتقادی، چیستی و چرایی، رویکرد‌های متفاوت، مفاهیم نظری و بنیادی، كرمانشاه: طاق بستان.
7. شعيري؛ حميد رضا، (١٣٩٨)، تجزيه و تحليل نشانه - معنا شناختی گفتمان، (ط. 7)، طهران: مركز تدوين الكتب للعلوم الإنسانية للجامعات (السمت) .
8. الهاشمی؛ أحمد، (١٣٨٨)، جواهر البلاغة، (المترجم: حسن عرفان)، (ط. 8)، إيران: قم
9. فيركلاف؛ نورمان، (١٣٧٩)، تحليل انتقادی گفتمان، المترجم: فاطمه شایسته وآخرون، طهران: مرکز للدراسات والبحوث للاعلام.
10. القاضي؛ رياض، (٢٠١٥)، احدب بغداد،(ط. 1)، لندن: دارالحكمة.
11. ( ٢٠١٧)، بيت القاضي العراب الاخير، لندن: مؤسسة Iraqi الإخبارية بالانجلترا
12. يورغنس؛ ماريون ولوييز فيليبس، (١٣٨٩)، نظريه و روش در تحليل گفتمان،المترجم: هادي جلیلی، طهران: طبعة اكسير.
13. ناصري، زهره سادات وآخرون، (۱۳۹۴)،« تحليل گفتمان انتقادی داستان مرگ بونصر مشکان براساس رویکرد نورمن فرکلاف»، مجلة علم زبان، (السنة الثالثة، العدد 4)، صص ٥٨-۶۴.
14. یحیای‌ایله‌ای، احمد، (۱۳۹۰)، «تحليل گفتمان چیست»، مجلة تحقیقات روابط عمومی،(السنة العاشرة، العدد 60) صص٥٨-٦٤.
15. Fairclough, N, (1989), Language and power, london: Longman.
16. Azarnoush, Azartash, (2012), Contemporary Dictionary, Arabic - Persian - English, (ed., 17), Tehran: Nei Publications.
17. Aqa Golzadeh, Firdaus, (2006), Critical Discourse Analysis and Literature, Journal of Adab Pejohi, (First Issue), pp. 17-27.
18. Baghini-Poor, Majid, (2001), Critical Discourse Analysis: Short analysis of power reflection in languagage, Journal of linguistics, (Vol. 16, No. 1), pp. 2-20.
19. Bijari, Azam Farah, and the others, (2013), Comparison of self-concept and adjustment in adjustment and incompatibility, Journal of psychological studies, (The Ninth Session, Number Four), pp. 99-127, Al-Zahra university, Faculty of education and psychology.
20. Hussain, Meskin, (2013), Poetry of the title in contemporary Algerian poetry, PhD thesis, Algeria: Oran University.
21. Qasimi Gorajoyi; Sajjad and Omid Ardalan, (2018), Critical Discourse Analysis, what and why, Different approach, Theoretical and Fundamental Concepts, Kermanshah: Taq Bostan.
22. Shoeiri, Hamid Reza, (2019), analysis of the cognitive meaning of the discourse, (7th), Tehran: Center for Compilation of Books for Humanities for Universities (Samt).
23. Al Hashemi; Ahmad, (2008), Jawaher al-Balaghah, (Translator: Hassan Irfan), (2c), Iran: Qom.
24. Fairclough, Norman, (2000), Critical analysis of discourse, Translated by Fatimah Shaiste Piran and others, Tehran: Media Studies and Research Center.
25. Al-Qazi, Riyadh, (2015), Ahadeb Baghdad,(First edition), London: Dar al-Hikma.
26. Al-Qadi, Riyad,(2017), Bayt al-Qadi al-Arab al-Akhir, Iraqibbc, Al-Ikhbariya Foundation in England: London.
27. Jurgens, Marian, and Louise Phillips, (2010), "Theory and Method in Discourse Analysis", Translated by Hadi Jalili, Tehran: Exir Press.
28. Naseri, Zohre Sadat; and etal, (2014). "Analysis of the critical discourse of the story of the death of Bunaser Meshkan based on the approach of Norman Ferclough", Journal of language science, (third year, issue 4), pp. 110-86.
29. Yahya Ilaei, Ahmed, (2018),"What is discourse analysis", Public Relations Research, 10(60). pp. 58-64
30. Fairclough, N, (1989), Language and power, london: Longman.
31. Azarnoush, Azartash, (2012), Contemporary Dictionary, Arabic - Persian - English, (ed., 17), Tehran: Nei Publications.
32. Aqa Golzadeh, Firdaus, (2006), Critical Discourse Analysis and Literature, Journal of Adab Pejohi, (First Issue), pp. 17-27.
33. Baghini-Poor, Majid, (2001), Critical Discourse Analysis: Short analysis of power reflection in languagage, Journal of linguistics, (Vol. 16, No. 1), pp. 2-20.
34. Bijari, Azam Farah, and the others, (2013), Comparison of self-concept and adjustment in adjustment and incompatibility, Journal of psychological studies, (The Ninth Session, Number Four), pp. 99-127, Al-Zahra university, Faculty of education and psychology.
35. Hussain, Meskin, (2013), Poetry of the title in contemporary Algerian poetry, PhD thesis, Algeria: Oran University.
36. Qasimi Gorajoyi; Sajjad and Omid Ardalan, (2018), Critical Discourse Analysis, what and why, Different approach, Theoretical and Fundamental Concepts, Kermanshah: Taq Bostan.
37. Shoeiri, Hamid Reza, (2019), analysis of the cognitive meaning of the discourse, (7th), Tehran: Center for Compilation of Books for Humanities for Universities (Samt).
38. Al Hashemi; Ahmad, (2008), Jawaher al-Balaghah, (Translator: Hassan Irfan), (2c), Iran: Qom.
39. Fairclough, Norman, (2000), Critical analysis of discourse, Translated by Fatimah Shaiste Piran and others, Tehran: Media Studies and Research Center.
40. Al-Qazi, Riyadh, (2015), Ahadeb Baghdad,(First edition), London: Dar al-Hikma.
41. Al-Qadi, Riyad,(2017), Bayt al-Qadi al-Arab al-Akhir, Iraqibbc, Al-Ikhbariya Foundation in England: London.
42. Jurgens, Marian, and Louise Phillips, (2010), "Theory and Method in Discourse Analysis", Translated by Hadi Jalili, Tehran: Exir Press.
43. Naseri, Zohre Sadat; and etal, (2014). "Analysis of the critical discourse of the story of the death of Bunaser Meshkan based on the approach of Norman Ferclough", Journal of language science, (third year, issue 4), pp. 110-86.
44. Yahya Ilaei, Ahmed, (2018),"What is discourse analysis", Public Relations Research, 10(60). pp. 58-64
45. Fairclough, N, (1989), Language and power, london: Longman.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
